Call Us Today For a Free Consultation!

How Are RSUs and Stock Options Treated for Colorado Child Support?

Person at a desk reviewing printed compensation statements beside a laptop and a calculator

RSUs and stock options are not the same thing for Colorado child support, and the gap between them is wider than it looks. Colorado appellate courts generally treat stock options as income when exercised. Guidance on RSUs is less settled: vested RSUs are commonly reported as wages, but how they are treated for support can depend on the circumstances.

Two people can hold identical paper wealth and produce very different worksheet numbers, purely because of the instrument. That is why an equity-heavy Colorado child support calculation should never be run off a single pay stub.

Award by award is the only honest way to do this. Grant date, vest date, exercise date, sale date.

What does Colorado count as income in the first place?

Almost everything. The definition is deliberately broad, and it starts with the item that matters most here.

Gross income includes income from any source, and the statute lists salaries and wages first, followed by commissions, independent contractor payments, bonuses, dividends, severance pay, capital gains, and a long list of other categories [1]. Equity compensation does not appear as its own line item anywhere on that list.

That absence is the whole reason this topic is confusing. Because there is no equity category, the analysis runs through how the award is reported and when the value is actually realized.

So the first question in these cases is never what the shares are worth. It is what happened, and when.

Do RSUs Count as Income for Colorado Child Support When They Vest?

In practice, usually yes, though the honest answer includes a caveat that most articles skip.

Colorado appellate guidance specifically on restricted stock and restricted stock units for support purposes is thin. A Colorado Bar Association analysis of executive compensation in divorce describes a dearth of guidance in Colorado on how to calculate income from restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards [2].

What fills that gap is the tax reporting. When an RSU vests, the value of the shares delivered is generally included in the employee’s W-2 wages for that year, and wages are the first category in the statutory definition of gross income.

That is the common approach rather than a settled Colorado rule, and it is worth saying plainly. A judge is not bound to treat an unusual one-time vesting event the same way as recurring salary.

Why are stock options treated so differently?

Because Colorado appellate courts have actually addressed options, and the rule they landed on is narrow.

Two published decisions carry the rule. In Campbell, where a husband received stock options in return for services and as an incentive for continued employment and the options vested at twenty percent per year, the Court of Appeals required his income to be calculated on the actual income he realized from exercising them. In Davis and Nguyen, a division stated that a spouse’s stock options are included in gross income for child support purposes only to the extent the options have already been exercised when support is determined.

Read that carefully, because it has a surprising consequence. Vesting is not enough. A parent can be holding fully vested options worth a great deal and still have nothing added to the support worksheet for them until an exercise happens.

That is not a loophole so much as a timing rule, and it cuts both ways. The year an exercise finally happens, the income spike can be dramatic.

How Do RSUs and Stock Options Affect Colorado Child Support Differently?

Here is an illustration built on stated assumptions rather than on any real case. Two engineers, same employer, same paper value, different instruments.

Assume each earns a $180,000 base salary, which is $15,000 a month gross. Assume the stock trades at $85.

Parent A: RSUsParent B: vested options
The award400 RSUs vesting this year2,000 vested options at a $40 strike
Paper value$34,000$90,000 of spread
Event this yearShares vest and are deliveredNothing; the options are not exercised
Typically added to gross incomeAbout $34,000, as W-2 wages$0 under the exercised-only approach
Monthly gross income usedAbout $17,833$15,000
Still divisible as property?Depends on grant and vesting datesDepends on grant and vesting dates

Parent B holds nearly three times the paper value and shows the lower income figure. Those numbers are hypothetical and are meant only to show how sensitive the result is to instrument and timing.

Run your own version before you agree to anything. That is the entire point of the exercise.

What happens when grants repeat every year?

Then the one-time-event framing stops fitting, and courts have tools for that.

Where a parent’s income substantially fluctuates, Colorado courts may consider past earnings or an average of past earnings when calculating income for support, and may take the same approach where the evidence about income conflicts. Where future bonuses are not guaranteed, it is not an abuse of discretion for a court to decline to estimate them, and the same reasoning is what makes projecting unexercised options so difficult.

For options, that averaging can be applied to a history of past exercises rather than to a prediction about future stock prices. A court has no way to know when options will be exercised or what the stock will be worth on that day.

So a documented multi-year pattern is the strongest evidence either side can bring. A single unusual year is the weakest.

Equity-compensated professionals also relocate more than most people, and support orders do not always follow cleanly. Johnson Law Group practices in Colorado, Illinois, Florida, and Wyoming, which matters when a grant was earned in one state and the order sits in another.

Can the same shares be counted twice?

Possibly, and this is the argument worth preparing for in advance.

Colorado law does not directly address double dipping in the context of executive compensation in a divorce. Absent a prohibition, awards may be characterized both as property to be divided in the divorce and as income from which support will be paid. Because Colorado domestic relations courts are courts of equity, a party can argue it is inequitable for the other spouse to receive a share of the award in the property division and support based on the same asset.

The property side has its own framework. Whether an award is property at all, whether it is marital or separate, and how to value the marital portion follow a three-step process, and awards partly earned during the marriage that vest after the decree are apportioned by the fraction earned during the marriage [3].

All of that ultimately runs through the same division statute that governs the rest of the estate [4]. Label each component in the settlement and show your work, so nobody has to reconstruct it two years later.

Which documents does this analysis actually require?

More than a pay stub, and less than you fear. Most of it comes from two places: the equity portal and the tax file.

  1. The plan document and every individual grant or award agreement, including performance conditions.
  2. The full vesting schedule, showing what has vested, what is scheduled, and on what dates.
  3. Brokerage statements and transaction confirmations for every vest, exercise, and sale.
  4. W-2s for the last three years, so you can see how vesting was reported rather than guessing.
  5. Tax returns with all schedules, including anything showing capital gains from share sales.
  6. Any deferral election, blackout window, or trading plan that limits when shares can be sold.

Questions people actually ask

What happens to child support if my equity awards stop?

A change in income can support a modification, but only going forward from the date you file, and Colorado deems a change producing less than ten percent to be not substantial and continuing. If a grant cycle ends and your income drops materially, that is a filing decision rather than a wait-and-see.

Should the support order say what happens when RSUs vest?

If equity is a meaningful part of the income picture, yes. An order or agreement that defines what gets counted, when it gets counted, and which documents get exchanged prevents the argument from restarting at every vesting date.

Do I have to update my financial disclosures when new grants are issued?

Disclosure obligations in Colorado domestic cases are continuing, so material changes generally have to be shared while a case is open. After a decree, what you owe the other parent depends on your own order, so read it before you assume nothing is required.

My RSUs vested but I sold nothing. Do I still owe support on them?

The vesting event is generally what appears on the W-2, whether or not you sold. That is the practical reason many people sell a portion at vest to cover the tax and the support consequence together.

What if my company is private and the shares cannot be sold?

Illiquidity is a real argument and courts hear it, but it does not automatically remove value from the analysis. Bring the plan restrictions in writing rather than describing them.

Talk it through with Johnson Law Group

Equity compensation is where an otherwise routine support calculation gets expensive to get wrong. Bring the grant documents and the last three W-2s to the first meeting, and the analysis usually resolves in one sitting.

Equity compensation is where a routine support calculation quietly goes wrong, and the parents who avoid that are usually the ones who got a clear read on their options early. Johnson Law Group handles Colorado family law matters from offices along the Front Range, and we will tell you plainly what the law does and does not allow in your situation.

We will not tell you how a judge will treat your grant. We will tell you what the statute counts, what Colorado case law has and has not settled, and what your own documents actually show.

Your case is handled by attorneys who work these issues every week, and you can review the background and credentials of our family law attorneys before you decide who to call.

We meet clients in person and by video, and you can find the closest of our offices when you are ready to schedule.

Schedule a free, no-pressure consultation. We will walk you through the process, explain what the court will look at, and give you a concrete next step.

This article is general information about Colorado law and is not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the specific facts of your case, the terms of your own orders, and the judge assigned to your matter. Speak with a Colorado family law attorney before acting.

Sources

[1] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-115(5) – Definition of gross income for child support, including salaries, wages, bonuses, and capital gains | https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_14-10-115
[2] In re Marriage of Campbell, 905 P.2d 19 (Colo. App. 1995); In re Marriage of Davis and Nguyen, 252 P.3d 530, 535 (Colo. App. 2011); In re Marriage of Rice and Foutch, 987 P.2d 947 (Colo. App. 1999); In re Marriage of Finer, 920 P.2d 325, 329 (Colo. App. 1996), as collected in Wells, Winter & Morando, “A Primer on Executive Compensation in a Colorado Divorce, Part 2,” 51 Colo. Law. 34 (June 2022) – Stock options as income only when exercised, income averaging for fluctuating income, and the double dip question | https://cl.cobar.org/features/a-primer-on-executive-compensation-in-a-colorado-divorce-part-2/
[3] Wells, Winter & Morando, “A Primer on Executive Compensation in a Colorado Divorce, Part 1,” 51 Colo. Law. 26 (May 2022) – Characterizing equity awards as property and apportioning the marital share | https://cl.cobar.org/features/a-primer-on-executive-compensation-in-a-colorado-divorce-part-1/
[4] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-113 – Disposition of property and the equitable division framework | https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_14-10-113

 

4.1 stars (based on 586 Ratings)
Request Case Assessment
Call Now