Call Us Today For a Free Consultation!

Can Text Messages, Social Media Posts, and Dating Apps Be Used in a Colorado Divorce or Custody Case?

Person at a desk holding a phone beside printed pages and a laptop

Yes, and more often than people expect. Digital messages, posts, and app activity come into Colorado family cases regularly, as long as they are relevant and properly authenticated.

The fight is almost never about whether texts count. It is about whether you can prove the message is what you say it is, and whether you got it in a way that does not create a second problem inside your Colorado divorce and custody case.

Preserve first. Argue later. Most of the damage in these cases is self-inflicted in week one.

What does Colorado require before a text comes in?

Two things: relevance, and a foundation. The foundation is where cases actually turn.

Colorado Rule of Evidence 901 conditions admissibility on evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. Colorado divisions have described that burden as a low bar requiring only a prima facie showing, and have applied it to Facebook messages and to text messages [1].

Once the proponent clears the bar, the actual authenticity of the evidence and the effect of any defects go to weight rather than admissibility. So a judge can let the messages in and still discount them.

That cuts both ways, and it is why the surrounding proof matters. Who had the phone, how the number is saved, whether the sender referenced things only they would know.

Are screenshots good enough?

Usually workable, always the weakest version. If you have a choice, do not choose the screenshot.

Colorado divisions have described a two-level authentication problem for printouts from social networking sites, worked through in Glover for Facebook messages and applied to text messages in Heisler. The proponent has to show the printout actually depicts the site, and separately has to connect the account or the post to the person.

A native export solves half of that automatically. Phone backups, platform data downloads, and carrier records carry timestamps and identifiers that a cropped image does not.

  • Export, then screenshot. Use the platform’s own download-your-data tool, then take screenshots as a convenience copy rather than as the record.
  • Capture the whole thread. A single message with the reply cut off is the easiest exhibit in the world to attack for context.
  • Keep the device. Do not upgrade the phone mid-case without talking to counsel about preserving the old one.
  • Never edit. Cropping to remove your own messages reads as concealment, and it usually gets discovered.

Can deleted messages be recovered?

Sometimes, and the more useful point is that you should not be the one deleting.


Start with what Rule 16.2 does and does not do. It requires parties in domestic cases to exchange mandatory financial disclosures and a sworn financial statement without waiting for a request, and it lets a court reallocate assets or liabilities for five years after a decree where a disclosure contained a material misstatement or omission [2]. That is a financial disclosure rule, and it is not the source of a general duty to preserve every text message or social media post.

The preservation duty comes from somewhere else. Once litigation is pending or reasonably foreseeable, destroying relevant messages or posts can create spoliation issues and possible court sanctions.

Deleting messages you know are relevant is a very expensive way to save yourself embarrassment. Judges treat destruction of evidence as a statement about credibility, and credibility is the currency in a custody case.

Recovery is possible in some cases through backups, the other party’s copy, or platform preservation requests. Those are decisions for counsel, not for a weekend of do-it-yourself forensics.

Should you record calls?

If you are on the call, Colorado law generally allows it. Recording consent is one of the few family law rules that flips at a state line, though, so where the other person is sitting matters.

That is a live problem for families with a parent in another state. Johnson Law Group practices in Colorado, Illinois, Florida, and Wyoming, and Illinois and Florida are generally treated as all-party consent states, which means a call that is lawful for you to record here can be unlawful to record there.

Wiretapping in Colorado applies to a person who is not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication and who knowingly records or intercepts it without the consent of either a sender or a receiver. Wiretapping is a class 2 misdemeanor [3].

Eavesdropping is the in-person analogue. A person not visibly present during a conversation who knowingly overhears or records it without the consent of at least one principal party commits eavesdropping, which is a class 2 misdemeanor [4].

A class 2 misdemeanor is not nothing. It carries up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750, and an unlawfully intercepted recording may also be subject to suppression on top of that criminal exposure. In a custody case where credibility is the currency, the second consequence is usually the more expensive one.

Leaving a recorder running in a room you then walk out of is the classic way a party loses the one-party consent protection. You have to actually be there.

Can You Access Your Spouse’s Online Accounts for Evidence?

Not without authorization, and that is the word the law turns on. Colorado’s computer crime statute reaches accessing a computer or system without authorization or exceeding authorized access, and whether a particular login was authorized depends on the facts.

A shared password from three years ago is not current authorization. A device sitting on the counter is not an invitation. A joint family plan does not make their messages yours.

The downstream problem is not just the evidence getting excluded. It is that the hearing stops being about your spouse’s conduct and starts being about yours, in front of the judge deciding parenting time.

So the practical advice is simple. Do not access an account or device without authorization, and do not assume old credentials still count as permission. If there is something you believe exists, tell your attorney, because discovery and preservation requests reach material you cannot lawfully take yourself.

What should you stop posting?

Assume every post is a potential exhibit, including the ones your friends can see and you think the other side cannot. Colorado directs the court not to consider conduct of a party that does not affect that party’s relationship to the child [5], so the question is never the post itself. It is what the post shows about your parenting.

  • Anything about the case. Vague-posting about a hearing is still about the hearing, and opposing counsel will read it that way.
  • Anything about the other parent. Colorado weighs whether each parent supports the child’s relationship with the other, and your feed is evidence on that factor. The statute expressly protects a parent whose limits on contact are protective actions against domestic violence or abuse.
  • Photos that contradict your financial position. A vacation post next to a claim that you cannot pay temporary support is a bad pairing.
  • Photos of the children with a new partner. Not because it is wrong, but because it hands the other side an easy narrative before you have framed it.
  • Anything sent while angry. The message you regret at midnight is the exhibit you see in six months.

Do not delete old posts once a case is filed or reasonably anticipated. Lock the accounts down going forward instead.

How Should You Preserve Digital Evidence for a Colorado Divorce or Custody Case?

  1. Back up the entire phone to a computer, not just to the cloud account your spouse can reach.
  2. Request your data download from each platform involved, and save the file unopened.
  3. Export message threads in full, with dates and phone numbers visible.
  4. Change passwords and enable two-factor authentication on your own accounts today.
  5. Log what you collected, when, and from which device, so the foundation is easy to lay later.
  6. Hand it to counsel before you send anything to anyone else.

Questions people actually ask

Can I subpoena my spouse’s phone records or social media accounts?

Your attorney can pursue records through discovery, and carriers and platforms respond to properly issued process. Message content is much harder to reach than account and billing records, because federal law limits what providers will produce, which is why the practical route is usually requesting the other party’s own exports.

What if my spouse deletes messages before I can save them?

Deletion is not always the end of it. Copies may exist on your device, in backups, or with other participants in the thread, and destroying relevant material once litigation is pending or reasonably foreseeable can itself become an issue in the case.

Do I have to turn over messages that hurt my own case?

If they are responsive to a proper discovery request, yes, and deleting them to avoid that is far worse than producing them. Tell your attorney about the unhelpful material early so it can be handled rather than discovered.

Do dating app profiles matter in a Colorado custody case?

Only to the extent they touch the child. Colorado directs the court not to consider conduct of a party that does not affect that party’s relationship to the child.

Talk it through with Johnson Law Group

Digital evidence wins cases when it is collected cleanly and loses them when it is not. Have counsel look at what you have before you collect more, post anything, or delete a single thread.

Digital evidence is easy to collect badly, and the parties who come out ahead are usually the ones who got a clear read on their options early. Johnson Law Group handles Colorado family law matters from offices along the Front Range, and we will tell you plainly what the law does and does not allow in your situation.

We will not promise that a text wins your case. We will tell you what is likely to hold up, how to preserve it, and which instincts to ignore before they cost you credibility.

Your case is handled by attorneys who work these issues every week, and you can review the background and credentials of our family law attorneys before you decide who to call.

We meet clients in person and by video, and you can find the closest of our offices when you are ready to schedule.

Schedule a free, no-pressure consultation. We will walk you through the process, explain what the court will look at, and give you a concrete next step.

This article is general information about Colorado law and is not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the specific facts of your case, the terms of your own orders, and the judge assigned to your matter. Speak with a Colorado family law attorney before acting.

Sources

[1] People v. N.T.B., 2019 COA 150, 457 P.3d 126 (Colo. App. 2019), quoting People v. Glover, 2015 COA 16, 363 P.3d 736 (Facebook messages) and citing People v. Heisler, 2017 COA 58 (text messages) – CRE 901 authentication of electronic communications and the prima facie standard | https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/col-crt-app-div-iii/2023463.html
[2] Colo. R. Civ. P. 16.2(e) – Mandatory disclosures and the five-year reallocation provision | https://www.coloradojudicial.gov/media/12295
[3] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 – Wiretapping prohibited; class 2 misdemeanor as amended by HB 23-1293, effective October 1, 2023 | https://law.justia.com/codes/colorado/title-18/article-9/part-3/section-18-9-303
[4] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-304 – Eavesdropping prohibited; class 2 misdemeanor for a person not visibly present | https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_18-9-304
[5] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-124(2) and (1.5)(a)(VI) – Conduct not affecting the parent and child relationship is not considered; the encourage-contact factor and its protective-actions proviso | https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_14-10-124

 

4.1 stars (based on 586 Ratings)
Request Case Assessment
Call Now